Virus china coronavirus wikipedia. On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

In short, Wikipedia has become central in how the ongoing health crisis is processed and discussed online. It's of course totally possible, even probable, but the fact is we won't know the true origin of the virus without a lot more research being done, and maybe not even then. . As soon as the crisis kicked off, people flocked to Wikipedia to read about the virus and its potential risks, turning to the online encyclopedia for bits of trusted information that would often be. Over a few weeks, the English-language version of Wikipedia witnessed the creation of at least six articles about the outbreak. This editorial diversity is evident in the outbreak article, for example, which — in a meta twist — now sports a on coronavirus-related disinformation.

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

More importantly, it also seems to have worked. Anyone else who wants to edit has to ask an experienced editor to plug in their change. The flip-side of that is that Wikipedia's free-to-edit, open format can be easily used to spread disinformation. One of the biggest issues plaguing the virus pages has to do with the tension between media sources and medical sources. Heilman is part of WikiProject Medicine, a small but extremely active group of Wikipedia editors focused on medical information. Wikipedia is always a collaborative effort by people from all backgrounds.

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

No decent reference was available and therefore it was not added. You can see an old version of the article where snakes were mentioned heavily here, with However, this paper was met with skepticism from the scientific community — and this was reflected in the page with only a. Yet another was in February to detail the symptoms of the respiratory disease caused by the virus. Since the beginning of January, have read those entries. The coronavirus outbreak has kept the members of the group busy in recent weeks. Currently, only editors with a username that is more than four days old and have at least ten edits under their belt can change its content. Was a found by Thai researchers? Editors like Doc James strive to maintain the highest editorial standards, demanding that every medical claim be backed only by peer-reviewed medical sources.

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

Not sufficient for inclusion and thus. We need a better source. On English Wikipedia, the pages about the outbreak and the virus have been locked to public editing. There are so many non-medical aspects about the virus — e. .

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

. . . . .

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

. . . . . .

Next

On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

virus china coronavirus wikipedia

. . . . . .

Next